Utilizarea metodei evaluării condiționate în amenajarea pădurilor urbane: o aplicație pentru Parcul Dendrologic Șipote

Addvances 2008. Studiu în rândul populației din Municipiul Sucevei. Web: http://primariasv.ro/portal/suceava/ portal. Accesat 11.2017

Anonymous 2009. Strategia de dezvoltare a municipiului Suceava în perioada 2009-2015. Websitul Primăriei Suceava.

Anonymous 2016. Strategia de dezvoltare a municipiului Suceava în perioada 2016-2021. Websiteul Primăriei Suceava.

Blakemore F. B., Williams A. T., Coman C., Micallef A., Unal O., 2002. A comparison of tourist evaluation of beaches in Malta, Romania and Turkey. World Leisure Journal 44(2): 29-41. DOI:10.1080/04419057.2002.9674268

Brega 1977. Parcul dendrologic "Șipote" din municipiul Suceava, pp. 153-169.

Chiriac D., Humă C., Stanciu M., 2009. Spaţiile verzi - O problema a urbanizarii actuale. Calitatea vieţii 20(3-4): 249-270.

Cianga N., Popescu C. A., 2013. Green Spaces and Urban Tourism Developmentin Craiova Municipality In Romania. European Journal of Geography 4(2): 34-45.

Clinovschi F., Bouriaud L., 1999. Biotopul şi relaţiile biotice specifice din parcul dendrologic Şipote. Analele Universităţii "Ştefan cel Mare" Suceava, Secţia Silvicultură 129-133.

De Groot R., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Econonimics 41(3): 393-408. DOI: 10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00089-7

De Stefano S., Deblinger R.D., 2005. Wildlife as valuable natural resources vs. intolerable pests: a suburban wildlife management model. Urban Ecosystems 8(2): 179-190. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-005-4379-5

Dobbs C., Escobedo F.J., Zipperer W.C., 2011. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning 99(3): 196-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2010.11.004

Drăgoi M., 2008. Economie și management forestier. Editura Universitatii Suceava.

Drăgoi M., Cîrnu M., 2016. Plata serviciilor ecosistemice: context legal și metode consacrate de evaluare, cu aplicație la păduri. Bucovina Forestieră 16(1): 95-106. DOI: 10.4316/bf.2016.008

Dumitraș D.E., Arion F.H., Merce E., 2011. A Brief Economic Assessment on the Valuation of National and Natural Parks: the Case of Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 39:134-138 https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha3915629

Dumitras A. F., Pop-Boanca P., Damian A., Bors-Oprisa S., Clapa D., Singureanu V., Sabo G., 2010. Life quality improvement in Romania's cities by transformation of vicinity forests in forest-parks with minimum interventions upon the natural environment. In XXVIII International

Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on 937, pp. 1081-1088).

Dumitras D. E., Ilea M., Jitea I. M., Arion F. H., 2012. The Recreation Value of Piatra Craiului National Park: A Combined Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Survey. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Horticulture 69:116-121.

Gavrilidis A. A., Ciocănea C. M., Niţă M. R., Onose D. A., Năstase I. I., 2016. Urban landscape quality index- planning tool for evaluating urban landscapes and improving the quality of life. Procedia Environmental Sciences 32: 155-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.020

Ghioca S., 2014. The cognitive map's role in urban planning and landscaping: application to Braila City, Romania. Cinq Continents 4(10): 137-157.

Gómez-Baggethun E., Barton D.N., 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 86: 235-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019

Groening G., 1995. School garden and kleingaerten: for education and enhancing life quality. Acta Horticulturae 391: 53-64. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.391.4

Helms J.A., 1998. The Dictionary of Forestry. The Societyof American Foresters, Bethesda.

Horodnic S., 2004. Elemente de biostatistica forestiera, Ed. Universităţii Stefan cel Mare Suceava, 159 p.

INS (Institutul Național de Statistică), 2011. Recensământul populaţiei şi al locuinţelor 2011. Web: http://www. recensamantromania.ro/rezultate-2/. Accesat: 15 martie 2016.

Iojă C. I., Rozylowicz L., Pătroescu M., Niţă M. R., Vânau G. O., 2011. Dog walkers' vs. other park visitors' perceptions: The importance of planning sustainable urban parks in Bucharest, Romania. Landscape and Urban Planning 103(1): 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.06.002

Ioja C., Patroescu M., Nita M., Rozylowicz L., Vanau G.,

Ioja A., Onose, D., 2010. Categories of residential spaces by their accessibility to urban parks-indicator of sustainability in human settlements Case study: Bucharest. Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development 5: 307-314.

Iojă C., Pătroescu M., Niculiţă L., Pavelescu G., Niţă M. R., Iojă A. D., 2008. Residential areas with deficient access to urban parks in Bucharest-priority areas for urban rehabilitation. Environmental Problems and Development 71-74.

Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y., 2009. Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities 26(4): 187-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.03.003

Jorgensen A., Anthopoulou A., 2007. Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands-does age make a difference? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 6(4): 267-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.004

Konijnendijk C.C., 1999. Urban forestry in Europe: a comparative study of concepts, policies and planning for forest conservation, management and development in and around major European cities.

Konijnendijk C.C., 2003. A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 5(2): 173-186. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00023-6

Legea 133, 2015. Codul Silvic. Publicat în Monitorul Oficial la data de 10.06.2015. Web: http://www.cdep.ro/ pls/legis/legis_pck.frame. Accesat: 11.2017

Lyytimäki J., Sipilä M., 2009. Hoping on one leg-the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 8: 309-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003

Miller R.W., 1997. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Green Spaces. second ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Niță M.R., Anghel A.M., Bănescu C., Munteanu A.M., Pesamosca S.S., Zețu M. Popa, A.M., 2017. Are Romanian urban strategies planning for green? European Planning Studies 26(1): 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1382446

Onose D. A., Iojă C. I., Pătru-Stupariu I., Niță M. R., Gavrilidis A. A., Ciocănea C. M., 2015. Analyzing the suitability of Bucharest urban parks for children related activities. Urban challenges in a complex world: Resilience, governance and changing urban systems, pp. 25.

Popa B., Pache R.G., 2016. The concept of ecosystem services-the solution to support the regulation efforts of the forestry sector in Romania. Revista Pădurilor 131(3/4): 41-53.

Radoslav R., 2011. Politici urbane (Studiu de caz: Timișoara, România). Colloquium politicum. Anul II 2(4) 29 p.

Rowcroft P., Black J., 2017. Toolkit of Measures for Managing Environmental Externalities in Urban Areas. World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank. DOI:10.1596/26764

Tyrväinen L., Pauleit S., Seeland K., de Vries S., 2005. Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. In: Konijnendijk C., Nilsson K., Randrup T., Schipperijn J. (Eds.), Urban Forests and Trees. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27684-X_5

Wilkes-Allemann J., Pütz M., Hirschi C., Fischer C., 2015. Conflict situations and response strategies in urban forests in Switzerland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 30(3): 204-216. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2014.1002217

Zhang W., Ricketts T.H., Kremen C., Carney K., Swinton S.M., 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64(2): 253-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024