Înțelegerea relației complexe dintre societate și mediu prin intermediul serviciilor ecosistemice forestiere: o revizuire sistematică a literaturii de specialitate
Cuvinte cheie:
biodiversitate, conservarea ecosistemelor, păduri, managementul suprafețelor forestiere, dezvoltare durabilă, strategii și măsuri silviceRezumat
Este bine cunoscut faptul că între societate și mediu există o relație complexă, iar pentru a înțelege și cuantifica această conexiune a fost introdus conceptul de servicii ecosistemice (ES). Implicarea acestui instrument facilitează explorarea și înțelegerea diverselor beneficii oferite în mod direct sau indirect de ES asupra populației. În special, serviciile ecosistemice forestiere (FES) dețin un rol semnificativ în menținerea unui echilibru între natură și societate, deoarece intervin în conservarea biodiversității, susținerea mediului și asigurarea unei calități superioare a vieții. Astfel, pădurile oferă un spectru variat de bunuri și servicii, care pot fi sistematizate în patru categorii principale: aprovizionare, suport, reglare și culturale.
Studiul de față realizează o revizuire a literaturii de specialitate în ceea ce privește serviciile ecosistemice forestiere cu accent pe conservarea biodiversității, dezvoltarea economică și gestionarea durabilă a acestor resurse naturale. Mai mult de atât, s-a urmărit identificarea măsurilor și soluțiilor silvice analizate în cadrul diverselor cercetări, fiind evidențiate diferite aspecte, precum importanța dezvoltării sustenabile a pădurilor, percepția diferiților factori interesați față de resursele naturale, protejarea suprafețelor forestiere, dezvoltarea economică și planificarea peisajului socio-ecologic. Rezultatele studiului aduc în prim plan importanța și necesitatea unei abordări holistice în cadrul cercetărilor ecologice și sociale pentru conturarea unei viziuni unitare asupra serviciilor ecosistemice forestiere. Această lucrare prezintă o imagine de ansamblu pentru cercetările viitoare, iar pe de altă parte reprezintă un instrument util în implementarea unei strategii sustenabile de dezvoltare a ecosistemelor forestiere.
Descărcări
Referințe
Acharya R. P., Maraseni T., Cockfield G., 2019. Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation - An analysis of publications. Ecosystem Services, 39: 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100979
Ahammad R., Stacey N., Sunderland T. C., 2019. Use and perceived importance of forest ecosystem services in rural livelihoods of Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Ecosystem services: 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.009
Al-assaf A., Nawash O., Omari M., 2014. Identifying forest ecosystem services through socio-ecological bundles: a case study from northern Jordan. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(4): 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.919968
Aznar-Sánchez J. A., Belmonte-Ureña L. J., López-Serrano M. J., Velasco-Muñoz J. F., 2018. Forest Ecosystem Services: An Analysis of Worldwide Research. Forests, 9(8): 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080453
Baciu G. E., Dobrotă C. E., Apostol E. N., 2021. Valuing forest ecosystem services. Why is an integrative approach needed?. Forests, 12(6): 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060677
Baskent E. Z., Borges J. G., Kašpar J., Tahri M., 2020. A design for addressing multiple ecosystem services in forest management planning. Forests, 11(10): 1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101108
Battes K., 2018. Ecologie generală: ghid de lucrări practice. Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 152 p.
Bilotta G. S., Milner A. M., Boyd I., 2014. On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 42: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010
Blanco V., Brown C., Holzhauer S., Vulturius G., Rounsevell M. D., 2017. The importance of socio-ecological system dynamics in understanding adaptation to global change in the forestry sector. Journal of environmental management, 196: 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.066
Blanco J., Sourdril A., Deconchat M., Barnaud C., San Cristobal M., Andrieu E., 2020. How farmers feel about trees: Perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices associated with rural forests in southwestern France. Ecosystem Services, 42: 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101066
Braat L. C., De Groot R., 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem services, 1(1): 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011
Brockerhoff E. G., Barbaro L., Castagneyrol B., et al., 2017. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv, 26: 3005-3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2
Chen S., Chen J., Jiang C., Yao R. T., Xue J., Bai Y., Wang H., Jiang C., Wang S., Zhong Y., et al., 2020. Trends in Research on Forest Ecosystem Services in the Most Recent 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis. Forests, 13(7): 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071087
Ciccarese L., Mattsson A., Pettenella D., 2012. Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. New forests, 43: 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9350-8
Ciesielski M., Stereńczak K., 2018. What do we expect from forests? The European view of public demands. Journal of environmental management, 209: 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.032
Cîrnu M., Nichiforel L., 2014. Analiza rolului serviciilor ecosistemice ale pădurii în strategia de marketing turistic a regiunii Bucovina. Bucovina, 14: 40-50.
Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. 2013. Guidelines for Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management. Version 4.2. Environmental Evidence: www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Guidelines/Guidelines4.2.pdf. [Accesat în data de 22 martie 2024].
Cudlín P., Seják J., Pokorný J., Albrechtová J., Bastian O., Marek M., 2013. Forest ecosystem services under climate change and air pollution. Developments in Environmental Science, 13: 521-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-098349-3.00024-4
Danley B., Widmark C., 2016. Evaluating conceptual definitions of ecosystem services and their implications. Ecological Economics, 126: 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.003
Duduman G., Drăgoi M., 2019. Amenajarea pădurilor. Vol. I: Organizare spațio-temporală. Editura Universității "Ștefan cel Mare", Suceava. 209 p.
Duncker P. S., Raulund-Rasmussen K., Gundersen P., Katzensteiner K., De Jong J., Ravn H. P., et al., 2012. How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: synergies and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05066-170450
Fischer J., Gardner T. A., Bennett E. M., et al., 2015. Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social-ecological systems perspective. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 14: 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.002
Garcia S., Abildtrup J., Stenger A., 2018. How does economic research contribute to the management of forest ecosystem services?. Annals of forest science, 75: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7
Gouwakinnou G. N., Biaou S., Vodouhe F. G., Tovihessi M. S., Awessou B. K., Biaou H. S., 2019. Local perceptions and factors determining ecosystem services identification around two forest reserves in Northern Benin. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0343-y
Guo Z., Xiao X., Gan Y., Zheng Y., 2001. Ecosystem functions, services and their values-a case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecological economics, 38(1): 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00154-9
Haddaway N. R., Macura B., Whaley P., Pullin A. S., 2018. ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
Hansen K., Malmaeus M., 2016. Ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 31(6): 626-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888
Hegetschweiler K. T., Wartmann F. M., Dubernet I., Fischer C., Hunziker M., 2022. Urban forest usage and perception of ecosystem services-A comparison between teenagers and adults. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 74: 127624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127624
Herrero-Jáuregui C., Arnaiz-Schmitz C., Reyes M. F., et al., 2018. What do we talk about when we talk about social-ecological systems? A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8): 2950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082950
Hirpa G. Y., Letema S. C., Ming'ate F. L., 2023. Effect of Forest Landscape Restoration on Ecosystem Services in Ethiopia: Review for Future Insight. Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues (IJSEI), 4(3): 327-338. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijsei.v4i3.1148
Hossain M. S., Dearing J. A., Eigenbrod F., Johnson F. A., 2017. Operationalizing safe operating space for regional social-ecological systems. Science of The Total Environment, 584: 673-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.095
Houballah M., 2019. Modeling multi-functional forest management through a social-ecological system framework-based analysis. Modeling and Simulation. Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] - teză de doctorat.
Koju U., Karki S., Shrestha A., Maraseni T., Gautam A. P., et al., 2023. Local stakeholders' priorities and perceptions towards forest ecosystem services in the Red panda habitat region of Nepal. Land Use Policy, 129: 106657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106657
Kornatowska B., Sienkiewicz J., 2018. Forest ecosystem services-assessment methods. Folia Forestalia Polonica. 60(4): 248-260. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2018-0026
Kramer K., Bouriaud L., Feindt P. H., Van Wassenaer L., Glanemann N., Hanewinkel M., et al., 2022. Roadmap to develop a stress test for forest ecosystem services supply. One Earth, 5(1): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.009
Lakerveld R. P., Lele S., Crane T. A., Fortuin K. P. J., Springate-Baginski O., 2015. The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosystem Services, 14: 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.001
Loft L., Le D. N., Pham T. T., Yang A. L., Tjajadi J. S., Wong G. Y., 2017. Whose equity matters? National to local equity perceptions in Vietnam's payments for forest ecosystem services scheme. Ecological Economics, 135: 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.016
Mace G. M., Norris K., Fitter A. H., 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27(1): 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
Maier C., Hebermehl W., Grossmann C. M., Loft L., Mann C., Hernández-Morcillo M., 2021. Innovations for securing forest ecosystem service provision in Europe-A systematic literature review. Ecosystem Services, 52: 101374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101374
Martínez Pastur G., Perera A. H., Peterson U., Iverson L. R., 2018. Ecosystem services from forest landscapes: an overview. Ecosystem services from forest landscapes: broadscale considerations. 2018: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74515-2_1
Mengist W., Soromessa T., 2019. Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis. Environmental Systems Research, 8(1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-019-0150-4
Millennnium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA)-Ecosystems and Human Well-Being; Biodiversity Synthesis World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
Montoya A. V. G., 2020. Capacitatea pădurilor amazoniene ecuadoriene de a furniza servicii ecosistemice: evaluarea utilității plantelor, capacității de a furniza produse şi servicii şi a percepției asupra sistemelor de management al peisajului în viziunea actorilor locali. Universitatea Transilvania din Brașov - teză de doctorat.
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaf J., et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med, 151: 264-9.https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Morri E., Pruscini F., Scolozzi R., Santolini R., 2014. A forest ecosystem services evaluation at the river basin scale: Supply and demand between coastal areas and upstream lands (Italy). Ecological indicators, 37: 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.08.016
Mundher R., Abu Bakar S., Maulan S., Mohd Yusof M. J., et al., 2022. Aesthetic quality assessment of landscapes as a model for urban forest areas: A systematic literature review. Forests, 13(7): 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13070991
Nesbitt L., Hotte N., Barron S., Cowan J., Sheppard S. R., 2017. The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25: 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.005
Ninan K. N., Inoue M., 2014. Valuing forest ecosystem services: What we know and what we don't. Valuing Ecosystem Services: 189-226. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955161.00021
Ninan K. N., Kontoleon A., 2016. Valuing forest ecosystem services and disservices-Case study of a protected area in India. Ecosystem services, 20: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.05.001
Niu X., Wang B., Liu S., Liu C., Wei W., Kauppi P. E., 2012. Economical assessment of forest ecosystem services in China: Characteristics and implications. Ecological Complexity, 11: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.01.001
Ojea E., Martin-Ortega J., Chiabai A., 2012. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for economic valuation: the case of forest water services. Environ. Sci. Pol., 19-20: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.002
Paluš H., Krahulcová M., Parobek J., 2021. Assessment of forest certification as a tool to support forest ecosystem services. Forests, 12(3): 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030300
Patterson T. M., Coelho D. L., 2009. Ecosystem services: Foundations, opportunities, and challenges for the forest products sector. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(8): 1637-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.010
Peters F., Lippe M., Eguiguren P., Günter S., 2023. Forest ecosystem services at landscape level-Why forest transition matters?. Forest Ecology and Management, 534: 120782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120782
Platon V., Frone S., Constantinescu A., 2015. New developments in assessing forest ecosystem services in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00225-7
Pimentel D., Garnick E., Berkowitz A., et al., 1980. Environmental quality and natural biota. BioScience, 30(11): 750-755. https://doi.org/10.2307/1308335
Pohjanmies T., Triviño M., Le Tortorec E., Mazziotta A., Snäll T., Mönkkönen M., 2017. Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective. Ambio, 46: 743-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0919-5
Raihan A., 2023. A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(3): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.56556/jescae.v2i3.554
Rodríguez-Echeverry J., Echeverría C., Oyarzún C., Morales L., 2018. Impact of land-use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Chilean temperate forests. Landscape ecology, 33: 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0612-5
Roesch-McNally G. E., Rabotyagov S. S., 2016. Paying for forest ecosystem services: voluntary versus mandatory payments. Environmental management, 57: 585-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0641-7
Sannigrahi S., Chakraborti S., Banerjee A., et al., 2020. Ecosystem service valuation of a natural reserve region for sustainable management of natural resources. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 5: 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100014
Sikora J., Wartecka-Ważynska A., 2017. Social functions of forests in Poland. Economics and Environment, 61(2): 14-14.
Sitar G. M., Rusu A. S., 2023. The Impact of Environmental Educational Programs in Promoting Insects Conservation Awareness: A Scoping Review. Journal of Educational Sciences, 24: 74-92 https://doi.org/10.35923/JES.2023.1.05
Smith N., Deal R., Kline J., Blahna D., Patterson T., Spies T. A., Bennett K., 2011. Ecosystem Services as a Framework for Forest Stewardship: Deschutes National Forest Overview. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington. 46 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-852
Soto J. R., Escobedo F. J., Khachatryan H., Adams D. C., 2018. Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: Examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosystem services, 29: 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.009
Taye F. A., Folkersen M. V., Fleming C. M., Buckwell A., Mackey B., Diwakar K. C., et al., 2021. The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 189: 107145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107145
Thompson S. W., Rogerson D., Ruddock A., Barnes A., 2020. The effectiveness of two methods of prescribing load on maximal strength development: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, 50(5): 919-938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01241-3
Vigna I., Besana A., Comino E., Pezzoli A., 2021. Application of the Socio-Ecological System Framework to Forest Fire Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13: 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042121
Vilkka L., 1997. The varieties of intrinsic value in nature: a naturistic approach to environmental philosophy. Rodopi, Amsterdam - Atlanta. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495104
Vizzarri M., Tognetti R., Marchetti M., 2015. Forest ecosystem services: issues and challenges for biodiversity, conservation, and management in Italy. Forests, 6(6): 1810-1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6061810
Wang S., Fu B., 2013. Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services. Forest Policy and Economics, 26: 145-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.07.014
Wilson S. J., Schelhas J., Grau R., Nanni A. S., Sloan S., 2017. Forest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecology and Society, 22(4): 38 https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09615-220438
Wu G., Xiao H., Zhao J., Shao G., Li J., 2002. Forest ecosystem services of Changbai Mountain in China. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences, 45: 21-32.https://doi.org/10.1360/02yc9003
Zanchi G., Brady M. V., 2019. Evaluating the contribution of forest ecosystem services to societal welfare through linking dynamic ecosystem modelling with economic valuation. Ecosystem Services, 39: 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101011
Zhang D., Stenger A., 2015. Value and valuation of forest ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2): 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.980852
Zhao X., Xu Y., Pu J., Tao J., Chen Y., Huang P., et al., 2024. Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds. Land Use Policy, 139: 107056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107056

Descărcări
Fișiere adiționale
Publicat
Cum cităm
Număr
Secțiune
Licență
Copyright (c) 2024 Medeea Halici, Laura Bouriaud

Această lucrare este licențiată în temeiul Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licența Open Access
Toate articolele și materialele suplimentare publicate în revista BUCOVINA FORESTIERĂ sunt disponibile sub o politică de acces liber gratuit (Open Access Licence) descrisă de BOAI, ceea ce implică accesul liber (fără nici o taxă) și nelimitat, pentru toată lumea, la conținutul integral al acestora.
Publicarea manuscriselor este gratuită, toate cheltuielile fiind suportate de către Facultatea de Silvicultură din cadrul Universități „Ștefan cel Mare” din Suceava.